Thursday, May 31, 2012

Ball Meets on Revenues, Misses on EPS

Ball (NYSE: BLL  ) reported earnings on Jan. 26. Here are the numbers you need to know.

The 10-second takeaway
For the quarter ended Dec. 31 (Q4), Ball met expectations on revenues and missed expectations on earnings per share.

Compared to the prior-year quarter, revenue expanded slightly, and GAAP earnings per share grew significantly.

Margins contracted across the board.

Revenue details
Ball logged revenue of $2.05 billion. The seven analysts polled by S&P Capital IQ expected to see net sales of $2.06 billion. Sales were 2.8% higher than the prior-year quarter's $2.00 billion.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Quarterly periods. Dollar amounts in millions.

EPS details
Non-GAAP EPS came in at $0.48. The 10 earnings estimates compiled by S&P Capital IQ predicted $0.53 per share on the same basis. GAAP EPS of $0.79 for Q4 were 8.8% lower than the prior-year quarter's $0.52 per share.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Quarterly periods. Figures may be non-GAAP to maintain comparability with estimates.

Margin details
For the quarter, gross margin was 17.0%, 80 basis points worse than the prior-year quarter. Operating margin was 8.3%, 50 basis points worse than the prior-year quarter. Net margin was 3.8%, 80 basis points worse than the prior-year quarter.

Looking ahead
Next quarter's average estimate for revenue is $2.03 billion. On the bottom line, the average EPS estimate is $0.59.

Next year's average estimate for revenue is $8.87 billion. The average EPS estimate is $3.10.

Investor sentiment
The stock has a three-star rating (out of five) at Motley Fool CAPS, with 239 members out of 250 rating the stock outperform, and 11 members rating it underperform. Among 94 CAPS All-Star picks (recommendations by the highest-ranked CAPS members), 92 give Ball a green thumbs-up, and two give it a red thumbs-down.

Of Wall Street recommendations tracked by S&P Capital IQ, the average opinion on Ball is outperform, with an average price target of $41.40.

  • Add Ball to My Watchlist.

Why the Dow Fell Triple Digits This Morning

Once again, the stock market demonstrated just how temperamental it can get, dropping sharply to start out the week. Most news reports cited two contributing factors: a key decision about Greek sovereign debt that many expect to reach some resolution this week, and U.S. economic data showing that incomes rose but spending stayed relatively flat, pushing the savings rate up to 4%. Just before 10:30 a.m. EST, the Dow Jones Industrials (INDEX: ^DJI  ) were down 119 points to 12,542, while the S&P 500 (INDEX: ^GSPC  ) fell 14 points to 1,302.

Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) was the Dow's biggest loser, dropping more than 3% in early trading. The bank made another change in the leadership team at its investment-banking business, according to The Wall Street Journal, further highlighting the difficulties that the company has had in integrating its purchase of Merrill Lynch back in 2009. The move reportedly involves replacing a triumvirate of co-leaders at the unit, choosing one to act as sole leader going forward. With other pressure on B of A, the stock could face a tough time after its strong performance opening 2012.

Disney (NYSE: DIS  ) also dropped sharply, falling more than 2% in early trading. The company announced that its new Disney Fantasy passenger ship will debut in New York City in March. Whether the recent cruise-ship tragedy in the Mediterranean will have a big impact on Disney's cruise business remains to be seen, but investors will be nervous until actual cancellation figures come in.

The only stock bucking the downtrend to rise was Verizon (NYSE: VZ  ) , up just 0.2%. Despite the small gain, the stock has fallen sharply since the beginning of the year, as its exposure to highly subsidized smartphones like the iPhone could put a crimp on margins despite boosting overall revenue.

Paying attention to stock news is smart, but not if it drives you away from long-term thinking. The Motley Fool's latest special report reveals the names of three stocks tailor-made for long-term investors. The report is yours free if you click here -- but don't wait: Do it now before it's gone.

Corning Passes This Key Test

There's no foolproof way to know the future for Corning (NYSE: GLW  ) or any other company. However, certain clues may help you see potential stumbles before they happen -- and before your stock craters as a result.

A cloudy crystal ball
In this series, we use accounts receivable and days sales outstanding to judge a company's current health and future prospects. It's an important step in separating the pretenders from the market's best stocks. Alone, AR -- the amount of money owed the company -- and DSO -- the number of days' worth of sales owed to the company -- don't tell you much. However, by considering the trends in AR and DSO, you can sometimes get a window onto the future.

Sometimes, problems with AR or DSO simply indicate a change in the business (like an acquisition), or lax collections. However, AR that grows more quickly than revenue, or ballooning DSO, can also suggest a desperate company that's trying to boost sales by giving its customers overly generous payment terms. Alternately, it can indicate that the company sprinted to book a load of sales at the end of the quarter, like used-car dealers on the 29th of the month. (Sometimes, companies do both.)

Why might an upstanding firm like Corning do this? For the same reason any other company might: to make the numbers. Investors don't like revenue shortfalls, and employees don't like reporting them to their superiors.

Is Corning sending any potential warning signs? Take a look at the chart below, which plots revenue growth against AR growth, and DSO:

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. FQ = fiscal quarter.

The standard way to calculate DSO uses average accounts receivable. I prefer to look at end-of-quarter receivables, but I've plotted both above.

Watching the trends
When that red line (AR growth) crosses above the green line (revenue growth), I know I need to consult the filings. Similarly, a spike in the blue bars indicates a trend worth worrying about. Corning's latest average DSO stands at 55.4 days, and the end-of-quarter figure is 52.8 days. Differences in business models can generate variations in DSO, and business needs can require occasional fluctuations, but all things being equal, I like to see this figure stay steady. So, let's get back to our original question: Based on DSO and sales, does Corning look like it might miss it numbers in the next quarter or two?

I don't think so. AR and DSO look healthy. For the last fully reported fiscal quarter, Corning's year-over-year revenue grew 6.9%, and its AR grew 11.2%. That looks OK. End-of-quarter DSO increased 4.0% over the prior-year quarter. It was about the same as the prior quarter. Still, I'm no fortuneteller, and these are just numbers. Investors putting their money on the line always need to dig into the filings for the root causes and draw their own conclusions.

What now?
I use this kind of analysis to figure out which investments I need to watch more closely as I hunt the market's best returns. However, some investors actively seek out companies on the wrong side of AR trends in order to sell them short, profiting when they eventually fall. Which way would you play this one? Let us know in the comments below, or keep up with the stocks mentioned in this article by tracking them in our free watchlist service, My Watchlist.

  • Add Corning to My Watchlist.

Staples Downgraded on Bleak Office Supply Outlook

We may not live in a paperless world yet, but Goldman Sachs analyst Matthew Fassler sees trouble ahead for office supply companies, which have not benefited much from improving employment trends.

Staples (SPLS) shares could slip as operating earnings should show little growth this year. Even with dividends, total return for Staples investors will likely be flat, Fassler argues.

Numerous trends are working against Staples and its peers: the amount of paper consumed per employee is in a downtrend; purchasing officers expect spending on office supplies to pick up more slowly than spending in other categories; and the office supply companies do not generally sell Apple (AAPL) products, which continue to take market share.

Fassler downgraded Staples to Sell, with a $15.75 price target. Shares were recently down 4.8% to $15.24.

Top Stocks For 2012-1-31-14

Charles Schwab Corp (NYSE:SCHW) announced the completion of its acquisition of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc. As of June 30th, optionsXpress had 397,400 client accounts, $8.4 billion in client assets and a 12 month average of 44,900 daily average revenue trades. Schwab operates one of the nation’s largest brokerage firms in terms of client assets, which totaled $1.66 trillion as of June 30, 2011 and serves more than 10 million individual, independent advisor client and retirement plan participant accounts with a wide range of financial products and full-service investment help and advice.

The Charles Schwab Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides securities brokerage, banking, and related financial services to individuals and institutional clients.

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (NYSE:JEC) announced that it has been awarded the second phase of the Ras Tanura Refinery Clean Fuels and Aromatics Project. This award is under the Saudi Aramco General Engineering and Project Management Services (GES+) Contract.

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. provides professional, technical, and construction services. Its services include engineering, design, and architectural services; construction and construction management services; operations and maintenance services; and process, scientific, and systems consulting services.

Crown Equity Holdings, Inc. (CRWE)

Crown Equity Holdings, Inc., together with its digital network, currently provides electronic media services specializing in online publishing, which brings together targeted audiences and advertisers. Crown Equity Holdings Inc. offers internet media-driven advertising services, which covers and connects a range of marketing specialties, as well as search engine optimization for clients interested in online media awareness.

Crown Equity Holdings advertises your business adjacent with their digital network content to their targeted audience, which are educated high income individuals.

Voice over Internet Protocol, a category of hardware and software that enables people to use the Internet as the transmission medium for telephone calls by sending voice data in packets using IP rather than by traditional circuit transmissions of the PSTN. One advantage of VoIP is that the telephone calls over the Internet do not incur a surcharge beyond what the user is paying for Internet access, much in the same way that the user doesn’t pay for sending individual e-mails over the Internet.

There are many Internet telephony applications available. VoIP also is referred to as Internet telephony, IP telephony, or Voice over the Internet. Voice over IP allows you to make free or very cheap phone calls locally and internationally.

Crown Equity Holdings Inc. (CRWE) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a joint venture to deploy VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) technology delivering voice, video and data services to residential and commercial customers. The joint venture company is Crown Tele Services Inc. which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crown Equity Holdings Inc. Crown Equity Holdings Inc. will own fifty percent (50%) interest in the joint venture.

Commenting on the joint venture, Kenneth Bosket, President of Crown Equity Holdings Inc., said: “We are excited to deliver VoIP communications solutions specifically designed to meet the business and residential market needs in this fast-growing global market.”

For more information, visit http://www.crownequityholdings.com

CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI) announced that it has completed its transaction to acquire Paradigm Holdings, Inc. (OTC:PDHO), the parent of Paradigm Solutions Corporation. Paradigm provides cybersecurity and enterprise IT solutions to clients in federal civilian agencies, the Department of Defense, and the Intelligence Community.

CACI International Inc, through its subsidiaries, provides information technology (IT) and professional services to the U.S. federal government and commercial markets in North America and internationally.

What the Future Holds for U.S. Stocks in Light of the Fed’s Failings

Major U.S. stocks were under pressure during most of the past week as new worries about Eurozone sovereign debt and a disastrous press conference by U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke corroded confidence.

This time, it was not just Greece that was pushing sellers' hot button, but also Italy, as the Mediterranean nation's banks are believed to have excessive exposure to troubled loans in the region. But at the center of the troubles was Bernanke, who looked helpless as an Econ 101 student in a master's class when asked by the media to explain why the economy was not improving as fast as expected.

On the plus side of the ledger this was a stronger-than-forecast increase in U.S. durable goods orders, some very upbeat inflation comments from China, and an improvement in German business confidence.

So where are we now?

Well, my premise at the start of the year was that you would not have to get too fancy to beat the broad market indexes, which are weighed down by troubles at the banks. The idea was you would not even have to get as fancy as picking the right world regions or sectors, like last year. Instead, you could put a large part of your portfolio in something as prosaic as the growth half of the S&P 400 Midcap Index - the iShares Midcap Growth Fund ETF(NYSE: IJK) fund - and let it ride.

That worked for me through mid-May, then it stopped out for a fat gain. Now it looks good to go again, as long as bulls man up and make a stand right here, right now.

I have recommended keeping portfolios a lot lighter than usual during the European sovereign debt crisis, just in case the market - acting as the collective unconscious - is giving us a signal that there is something really wrong on the road ahead.

But if we ever get an all-clear sign in the form of one or two high-volume, high-intensity up days heading into earnings season, investors can go back full tilt boogie on mid-cap growth stocks.

Now mind you, we may never get that all-clear sign. And we may need to recognize that there could be a slide into the fall culminating with an epic wipeout that would lead us to try to buy another fantastic bottom like March 2009.

But for now, let's just be happy that mid-cap growth is still up 7% for the year. Add on 5.5% gain from our high-yield mortgage bond fund positions, like DoubleLine Total Return (MUTF: DBLTX), and you're up 12% in half a year. That's excellent. Now is time to preserve that, and add on.


Keeping Your Cane CloseNow what if the all-clear sign never appears?

The riskier sector funds are probably going to act more like trading vehicles than long-term investments over the next few months. Active investors will need to prepare to sell at resistance and buy at support until we can get past this rocky stretch and go back to long-term holds.

My strongest hope is if the market is super-choppy through early fall, we will end up with enough winnings set aside that we can buy into a distinct low in October.

Of course, that's easier said than done. But with any luck, we will have the opportunity to get out our canes in the fashion of the great Henry Clews -- the Civil War and Gilded Age era financier who wrote about his experiences in the 1887 classicTwenty Eight Years in Wall Street.

Clews wrote:

''But few gain sufficient experience in Wall Street to command success until they reach that period of life in which they have one foot in the grave. When this time comes, these old veterans of the Street usually spend long intervals of repose at their comfortable homes, and in times of panic, which recur sometimes oftener than once a year, these old fellows will be seen in Wall Street, hobbling down on their canes to their brokers; offices.

"Then they always buy good stocks to the extent of their bank balances, which they have been permitted to accumulate for just such an emergency. The panic usually rages until enough of these cash purchases of stock is made to afford a big "rake in." When the panic has spent its force, these old fellows, who have been resting judiciously on their oars in expectation of the inevitable event, which usually returns with the regularity of the seasons, quickly realize, deposit their profits with their bankers, or the overplus thereof, after purchasing more real estate that is on the upgrade, for permanent investment, and retire for another season to the quietude of their splendid homes and the bosoms of their happy families."

So now if I say in October "get out the canes" you will know what I am referring to.
The Fed's Failings The Federal Reserve's statement after its rate-setting committee meeting acknowledged the recent weakening in the economy and in employment but tied them to temporary factors, arguing that the recovery is ''continuing at a moderate pace.''

The key wrinkle that emerged was the notion that the Fed did not intervene last year to help the economyper sebut to stave off deflation. This notion has always been a part of the Fed's communications, but it has not been given the primary role that it is being accorded now.

Bernanke said in his press conference that the Fed only acted last year because the falling rate of inflation last summer suggested that deflation was becoming a serious threat. The subsequent rebound in core inflation suggests that threat has eased, he argued, at least for now.

Strip away the niceties, and here's what you have: He has decided to declare victory and go home.

Paraphrasing again, in my view Bernanke is saying: "QE2 solved the problem of the threat of deflation. Oh, you thought it was supposed to help the economy? You are mistaken."

The Fed can deflect blame for the idea that QE2 did not boost the economy by claiming it was not supposed to. This is new, and I do not think it is market-friendly.

The Bottom Line:The Fed is likely to stay on the sidelines the rest of this year. If core inflation is falling next year, and lower government spending means that economic growth will be muted, we can still expect the Fed to loosen rather than tighten monetary policy somehow - most likely with something akin to QE3. In short, don't expect another round of large-scale asset purchases of the type that have supported the market for the past nine months.

It's hard to see how any of this is going to be a positive for stocks, but I would love to be surprised to learn that this scenario has already been discounted.

The Week Ahead Monday June 27: Personal income for May; personal consumption expenditures for May; Core PCE price index for May

Tuesday June 28: Conference board consumer confidence index for June

Thursday June 30: Initial jobless claims for week of June 18; Chicago PMI for June 11

Friday July 1: Motor vehicle domestic sales; Reuters/University of Michigan consumer sentiment index; composite index of ISM manufacturing survey; construction spending.

Note: Usually non-farm payrolls is released on the first Friday of the month. This time it will be released on the second Friday instead, on July 8.

News and Related Story Links:

  • Money Morning: Expect Bernanke, Fed to Again Downplay Threat of Inflation
  • Money Morning: The U.S. Federal Reserve Plan For QE3 - And Why It's a Done Deal
  • Money Morning:
    Don't Get Suckered by Wall Street's Wimpy Gold Price Forecasts
  • Money Morning: The One Thing To Watch as the Fed Abandons U.S. Stocks

Yield Hog Alert: Buy GM Bonds

Are you a hog for yield?� If so, General Motors (GM) bonds are a screaming buy.� The automaker is in absolute distress, but the government has your back.� Why not take a shot at some very juicy returns here?

General Motors has given voice to a reality long recognized by observers and analysts around the world: the U.S. auto industry is doomed for oblivion without fundamental changes in their operations.

The announcement that GM will exhaust its cash reserves by mid-2009, or earlier, merely amplifies the facts already known to the public.

GM is a labyrinthine company without a distinct identity. In addition, General Motors is the personification of the credit tsunami afflicting many industries and companies worldwide.

In the case of GM, and probably many other companies starving for credit and sales, at least a part of the problem has been inflicted by a related company: the untimely tightening of credit standards at General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), which shut large numbers of previously qualified purchasers out of the automobile purchase market.

GM does have a number of steps it could take to return to being competitive with foreign brands. Reducing its Rube Goldberg array of lines, ramping up the production of fuel-efficient and electric autos and following through or accelerating the retooling and closing of obsolete production facilities are among the steps which are likely to be taken in the coming months.

Will these measures and others previously announced be enough? Only time will tell. But GM has one other tremendous asset which will in all likelihood buy the company extra time to gain new traction in the market…

Currently the company employs around 140,000 people in its United State operations. (See also: "Can GM Pull a U-Turn?")

With the U.S. economy in a major decline and headed into what many expect to be a prolonged recession, the administration and Congress are unlikely to stand by as America’s behemoth closes its doors.

Even a Chapter 11 filing would have consequences that are unacceptable to our political leaders. Reluctant suppliers would exact onerous terms for delivery of their products, competitors would seize on the weakness of GM to increase market share and valued employees would be easy prey for those same competitors.

Is there an investment opportunity lurking in the wings of disaster at GM?

Forget about the equity in GM as shareholder value is expected to go to zero.� Instead, check out the returns of GM bonds.

Currently priced to yield nearly 50%, the GM bond maturing in July of 2013 is generating a return likely to be attractive to the investors with an appetite for substantial risk in part of their portfolios. And with the high probability of an intervention by the U.S. Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), that risk may be substantially mitigated.

The application of TARP resources to GM and others in the auto industry was made even more likely with the election of Barack Obama to the oval office.� The risk/reward here appears to be weighted in favor of the investor.

This article was written by Jamie Dlugosch, contributor to InvestorPlace.com. For more actionable insight like this, go to: www.InvestorPlace.com. James F. Dlugosch contributed to this article.�Jim has over 40 years experience in the credit markets including serving as Director of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in the 1970s.�He also led the fixed income group of a large regional brokerage firm before owning his own firm that specialized in underwriting and trading fixed income securities.� He is a contributor to The Rational Investor, but most importantly, he is my father.

Don’t Tap Germany Through the Bund Fund

If there is one word that summarizes the choppy, volatile year that was 2011, it would be �Europe.� Last year, the market lived or died based on developments (or lack thereof) in the ongoing European sovereign debt crisis. But when investors weren�t running to the safety of U.S. Treasuries, they were heading for the (relative) safety of German bunds. With the periphery of Europe threatening to descend into chaos, mighty Germany seemed a rock of stability.

Today, getting access to the German bund market is as easy as buying a share of General Electric (NYSE:GE) or Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) with the arrival of the ProShares German Sovereign/Sub-Sovereign ETF (NYSE:GGOV). The ETF gives investors access to euro-denominated bonds issued by the Federal Republic of Germany, the state governments of Germany, and various federal and state agencies.

Before, it was somewhat difficult for individual investors (and even professional traders) to get access to the German bund market. The world�s bond markets are far more opaque than the respective stock markets, and few of the popular retail brokers gave their clients ready access. Buying a foreign bond meant going through the bond desk and often paying a frustratingly large bid-ask spread. In other words, it wasn�t easy and it wasn�t cheap. But now with GGOV, you can have instant exposure to the German bund market with a click of the mouse.

But while buying German bunds is easy now, it doesn�t necessarily mean it�s a good idea. The 10-year bund yields a pitiful 1.85%, according to Bloomberg. This is even lower than the less-than-inspiring 1.87% offered by the 10-year U.S. Treasury note. At a sub-2% yield, German bunds are not worth buying for income.

For dollar-based investors, German bunds could be a way to get exposure to a rally in the euro. But for most investors, there are easier and more direct ways to trade the euro that don�t involve interest rate risk.

And we must not forget the elephant in the room: If the European debt crisis takes a turn for the worse and Germany finds itself in the unenviable position of having to bail out the rest of the eurozone, how safe is Germany�s AAA credit rating, and would German bunds still be considered the safe haven they are today?

There is no good way to answer this question, of course, but it certainly makes me think twice before putting capital at risk. To paraphrase a quote from newsletter writer Jim Grant, at current low yields, government bonds no longer represent a risk-free return. Instead, they offer a return-free risk.

If you are going to put capital at risk, you should expect a reasonable return on your investment. You�re not going to get that with shares of GGOV at current prices and yields.

This does not mean Europe is without its attractions. In my view, blue-chip European multinationals offer some of the best potential returns in the world at current prices. In the Sizemore Investment Letter, I�ve highlighted plenty, including Spain�s Telefonica (NYSE:TEF) and the Anglo-Dutch consumer products giant Unilever (NYSE:UL).

Investors looking for a one-stop ETF option should consider the iShares MSCI Germany ETF (NYSE:EWG). EWG is a basket of Germany’s largest and most globally diversified blue chips. With a dividend of 3.51%, you�re getting nearly double the yield of GGOV with the possibility of substantial capital gains in 2012.

Charles Lewis Sizemore, CFA, is the editor of the Sizemore Investment Letter, and the chief investment officer of investments firm Sizemore Capital Management. As of this writing, he did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned securities. Sign up for a FREE copy of his new special report: �4 Dividend Stocks to Buy and Forget.�

Netflix Kills Shorts, But Gains May Not Last

In late November, it looked as though Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) was destined for oblivion as the stock reached a low of $62.37. Keep in mind that just a few months earlier, it was over $300.

Since then, Netflix has staged a mighty comeback. And yes, it got a nice boost from yesterday’s Q4 earnings release. The shares are up 23%, to $116.94 — the biggest move in two years.

The key was that Netflix has been getting its subscriber mojo back. In the quarter, it signed up 610,000 customers, putting the total at 24.4 million (the prior quarter had seen a loss of 800,000). This will certainly help to boost cash flow, which is sorely needed.

Yet investors need to be extremely cautious. According to an analysis by Data Explorers, short interest in Netflix spiked 38%, to 12%, in the past month. (Shorts are investors who profit when a stock falls.)

However, they run the risk of a short squeeze. This means that investors often scramble to unwind their positions when there is positive news on a stock — which adds to the buying pressure. So it’s a good bet that a meaningful share of Netflix’s stock surge has come from this.

On a fundamental basis, Netflix is still in a precarious spot. It will take time for it to recover from its disastrous recent moves, such as the attempt to split its streaming and DVD-delivery businesses.

Netflix’s price hike could also continue to be a problem. After all, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) is expected to launch its own streaming service in the U.S. With its huge distribution footprint — which now includes the Kindle Fire — Amazon could be a worthy competitor. Even more important, Amazon has shown that it can be brutal with its pricing.

This is crucial since margins are only 11% on�Netflix’s streaming business. Interestingly, margins on the DVD business are 52%. But according to CEO Reed Hastings, the segment customer count will �decline every quarter�forever.� Keep in mind that the DVD business is a key source of cash flow.

Then there’s Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). The company has a huge cash hoard and needs to find more growth opportunities. Might it use its resources to lock up content? And won�t this further drive up content cost, which is already expensive for Netflix?

It�s true that international markets represent a big opportunity and should be a driver of long-term growth. Already Netflix has made inroads into Latin America and the U.K. However, it is far from clear what the level of customer adoption will be. It might not be on the scale seen in the U.S.

If so, the international strategy could be a big drag on Netflix.

Tom Taulli runs the InvestorPlace blog�IPO Playbook, a site dedicated to the hottest news and rumors about initial public offerings. He also is the author of��All About Short Selling��and��All About Commodities.��Follow him on Twitter at�@ttaulli. As of this writing, he did not own a position in any of the aforementioned securities.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

SM: Good Will Hunting

If you're a long-time reader of SmartMoney.com, chances are you've spent plenty of your free time thinking about the money you'll have available at retirement. But what have you done to plan out your estate? The sad truth is that most of us -- some 70% of adult Americans -- have neglected to write a will. Some think their assets are just too puny to worry about, others worry that the costs of writing a "last will and testament" are too high.

But wills aren't just vehicles for the wealthy or the morbid. If you've got a family and a home -- not to mention a savings account -- you should definitely have one. Cost is no excuse. While the average will drawn up by a lawyer typically runs from $500 to $1,000, you can get a simple will at a legal clinic for as little as $75.

For most people, the first time in your life that a will becomes imperative is when you have children. Forget about your assets for a minute. In the terrible event that you and your spouse die at the same time without a will, it falls to a probate court judge to name a guardian for your minor-aged children -- not a pleasant prospect. That's why it is a crucial first step to name a guardian you can trust. Our experts recommend naming an alternate guardian in the document, as well, in case something happens to your first choice.

Writing a will, of course, is also your chance to clarify who gets what in your estate. Before you can do that, however, you have to tally up your assets. That includes your house, your investment portfolio, the value of your retirement plan and the payout of your insurance plan. If the experience of our experts is any guide, most people are worth more than they think. Once you've got your assets listed, you can decide what you want to leave to whom and who will be executor of your estate. One important caveat: Make sure that the beneficiaries listed in your will match the beneficiaries you name on your insurance policy and in your 401(k).

For more on trusts, visit the Estate Planning

Once you have a will in place, don't forget to update it regularly. You'll need to amend it whenever there is a big change in your family's circumstances -- a birth, a death or marriage, or even if you move out of state. Again, our Estate Planning section has more tips on setting up one of these crucial documents as cheaply as possible. But do it now. A will may seem like a hassle, but that's nothing compared to the troubles your heirs will endure if you are unfortunate enough to die without one.

Limited Surpasses Expectations

Limited Brands Inc. (LTD), a specialty retailer of women’s intimate and other apparel, beauty and personal care products, recently posted stronger-than-expected fourth-quarter 2009 results sending shares up 4% or 85 cents to $22.39 in after-market trading on Wednesday.

The company’s sustained focus on cost containment, inventory management, and merchandise initiatives has kept it afloat in a difficult consumer environment.

Earnings versus Zacks Consensus

The quarterly earnings of $1.01 per share have outdone the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 98 cents, and rose 49% from 68 cents delivered in the prior-year quarter. The quarterly earnings topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 3%. Limited Brands’ earnings surprise, when compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimates in the preceding four quarters, varies between 6% and 300%, with the average being 113%.

Management now expects first-quarter 2010 earnings in the range of 5 cents to 10 cents a share. The current Zacks Consensus Estimate is 7 cents, which has remained stagnant in the last 30 days with only two out of 19 analysts covering the stock raising their estimates, and one analyst lowering estimate, ultimately having no impact on the consensus.

Limited Brands also forecasted fiscal year 2010 earnings between $1.40 and $1.60 per share. The current Zacks Consensus Estimate is $1.42, which has increased 4% in the last 30 days with 12 analysts raising their estimates.

Quarterly Performance

Limited Brands, the owner of the Victoria’s Secret and Bath & BodyWorks chains said that net sales for the quarter rose 2% to $3,063.4 million, reflecting an increase of 1% in comparable-store sales.

Based in Columbus, Ohio, Limited Brands now expects February 2010 comparable-store sales to increase in the high-single to low-double digit range, following a 6% jump in January 2010 and a decline of 2% in December 2009, reflecting signs of improvement, as consumers, who cut back their discretionary spending during the recession are now starting to loosen their purse strings. Earlier, the company had expected comparable-store sales to remain flat in February 2010.

Gross profit for the quarter soared 22% to $1,249 million, helped by a 2% increase in the top-line and an 8% decline in cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy. Gross margin expanded 700 basis points to 41%. Adjusted operating income rose 50% to $585.5 million, whereas operating margin expanded 600 basis points to 19%.

Limited Brands sells its merchandise through specialty retail stores in the United States and Canada, which are primarily mall-based, and through its websites, catalog and other channels. The company currently operates 2,971 specialty stores.

3 Must-Buy Stocks on the Right Side of the Earnings Divide

The market has boomed on a number of strong earnings results and positive forward guidance. But this earnings season’s results have been polarizing. Companies with strong earnings are seeing significant gains, and companies with poor earnings are getting punished. There has been very little middle ground for companies, and that’s what makes this earnings season so important.

Just look at FedEx (NYSE:FDX) and Family Dollar (NYSE:FDO), and you’ll see what I mean. FDX jumped 8% after announcing profits surged 76% year-over-year and total sales climbed 10% to $10.59 billion. FDO, on the other hand saw its stock drop 7% on the day it reported profits and sales that failed to meet analyst expectations.

This divide between winners and losers is increasing because we’re now nearing “peak earnings.” The financial crisis was a massive hit to earnings. So, the subsequent recovery years showed dramatic improvement on a year-over-year basis. But those types of growth rates were not sustainable, and the new year-over-year comparisons are getting tougher. Analysts are taking this into account and currently are expecting about 7% average growth for S&P 500 companies — down from the 15% expected just three months ago. Here’s an example of why earnings growth is slowing:

Company A had earnings per share of $1 in the quarters before the financial crisis. During the crisis, earnings dropped to 50 cents per share. Then, as the recovery took hold, earnings improved to 75 cents per share and back to $1 per share. That growth came from customers coming back — not from real company growth. Now that the company is looking at more normal growth rates and might post in the neighborhood on $1.10 per share, that 10% rise in earnings looks pretty pitiful compared to last year’s 33% rise.

Obviously, the key to being on the right side of the divide is to demand each of your portfolio holdings to have strong sales and profits that translate to earnings growth

Take the following for example:

Check Point Software Technologies (NASDAQ:CHKP). The company reported top- and bottom-line growth that trumped estimates across the board. Management announced that the company experienced exceptional performance across all of its key business metrics and was especially successful in its products and licenses segment as well as its software updates business.

As such, sales for the fourth quarter increased 12% year-over-year to $356.8 million. This topped the consensus sales estimate of $355.6 million. Similarly, net income for the quarter climbed 16% to $159.8 million, or 75 cents per share. Excluding special items, adjusted earnings weighed in at 84 cents per share, trumping the consensus earnings estimate of 82 cents per share by 2%.

For the full year, earnings jumped 20% to $544 million, or $2.54 per share, and total sales rose 14% to $1.25 billion. This earnings announcement kicked off the trading week on the right foot, and I want you to add this conservative stock below $59.

Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) also announced solid earnings performance for the fourth quarter. Total sales climbed 28% year-over-year to $497 million, thanks to increased sales of its patented da Vinci surgical system. This trumped the consensus sales estimate of $483.7 million by 3%. Over the same period, net income jumped 25% to $151 million, or $3.75 per share. Street analysts forecast earnings of just $3.35 per share, so the company posted a 12% earnings surprise.

The only downside I see to the report is news that European hospitals are becoming more careful with their spending, so sales have slowed down a bit on that front. However, the company remains dedicated to expanding in international markets, and its hard work is paying off in countries like Korea. I’m not overly concerned with this. The da Vinci Surgical system is one of a kind, and the company is smart to focus on emerging Asian markets.

The other thing to note about this stock is that it has been on an incredible run. So the dip we saw after earnings is just a case of normal profit-taking, and if you look at ISRG’s chart, you’ll notice that this stock tends to gain tremendous ground and then recede briefly when earnings are released. With that in mind, I reiterate my “strong buy” recommendation. Continue to buy shares of this moderately aggressive stock below $484.

UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH) revealed stellar operating performance in both the fourth quarter and for full-year 2011. In particular, its Optum segment, which focuses on population health management and care delivery, grew sales by 23% in Q4 2011 compared with Q4 2010. OptumHealth now serves nearly one in five Americans. The company also served an additional 170,000 people in the fourth quarter, helping to boost the company’s top- and bottom-lines.

Total fourth-quarter sales rose 8% to $25.92 billion, topping analyst estimates of $25.7 billion. Over the same period, net earnings advanced 22% to $1.26 billion, or $1.71 per share. The Street forecast earnings of $1.03 per share, so UnitedHealth Group posted a 14% earnings surprise. You should continue to buy this conservative stock below $56.

Why the World Cup Might Not Be Good for South Africa ETF

Whenever a country plays host to an international sporting event, it’s thought to be boon to its economy. But this may not necessarily be the case for this year’s World Cup host, South Africa, or its ETF.

The 2010 World Cup may benefit South Africa through increased employment, a rise in tourism, a better reputation for the country, investment in green energy and improved city infrastructure, writes Miko Schneider for Play the Game. Still, local businesses and industries had to accommodate FIFA regulations or government legislation, which could have a negative effect.

  • The “2010 Soccer World Cup Liquor Policy” might force public establishments screening World Cup matches, such as bars, pubs and restaurants, to pay around $680 for a special liquor license.
  • Informal traders’ have been barred from conducting business in certain areas.
  • Domestic workers are angry that overseas manufacturers of clothing, flags, buses and beer will not benefit local industries.
  • Barrie Jarrett, CEO of TEAMtalk Media, reasons that the short-term inflated pricing of flights, hotels and even beer may persuade tourists to go elsewhere.
  • Additionally, the South African rand is too strong and may turn away foreign tourists.

In other ways, South Africa is looking more appealing: the South African economy is expanding at its fastest pace in more than a year, and inflation is expected to exceed the target range for a second month, which will make further interest rate cuts unlikely, reports Nasreen Seria for BusinessWeek.

South Africa’s manufacturing purchasing managers’ index has stayed above 50 since November, and output returned to growth with a 3.2% year-over-year increase in December, according to Times LIVE. Consumer inflation rate was at 6.4% year-over-year in January, above the 3% to 6% target, and at 0.4% on a monthly basis. January’s producer inflation rate is estimated to increase to 1.9% year-over-year from 0.7% and prices should rise 0.8% from December.

Unemployment is still very high, standing at 24.3%. Ouch.

  • iShares MSCI South Africa Index Fund (NYSEArca: EZA)

Max Chen contributed to this article.

ECB Keeps Interest Rates Steady, but May Toughen Inflation Talk

The European Central Bank (ECB) declined to raise interest rates on Thursday, keeping them at 1% despite an inflation rate within the euro zone that has risen above 2.4%.

This is the third month in a row that the inflation rate has exceeded the ECB’s target rate of below 2%. Jean-Claude Trichet, president of the ECB, would have to change his tone to deliver a stern message on inflation. As previously reported by AdvisorOne, after a statement earlier in the year that sent markets scurrying for cover, Trichet had backed off. There was also an expectation that the ECB might begin to withdraw crisis support measures at its Thursday meeting.

Reuters reported that economists had expected the interest rate to stay the same at Thursday’s meeting. However, in a poll, it found that the median expectation was for rates to hold steady till the fourth quarter of 2011, despite financial market investors apparently believing that the change will come in the third quarter instead.

Even though borrowing from the ECB has fallen by 100 billion euros ($139.392 billion) since the beginning of the year, Francesco Papadia, head of market operations at the ECB, said in the report that money markets were polarized and peripheral nations still dependent on the ECB for their liquidity. An anonymous money market desk head was quoted as saying, "The ECB will definitely be pleased with the reduced demand for liquidity. The wording from policymakers over the last week has been very clear that they will resume the exit [from crisis measures]."

While new staff economic projections will be released, it is expected by analysts that those figures will be revised upward thanks to inflation and growth. The figures also will not account for the runup in oil prices because of unrest in the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Top Stocks To Buy For 2012-2-1-4

ATP Oil & Gas Corporation NASDAQ:ATPG opened at $16.06 and with a gain of 10.23% closed at $17.24. Company’s fifty days average price is $15.78 whereas it has a market capitalization $883.92 million.
The total of 4.81 million shares was transacted over last trading day.


Level 3 Communications, Inc. NASDAQ:LVLT opened at $1.15 and with a gain of 8.85% closed at $1.23. Company’s fifty days average price is $1.05 whereas it has a market capitalization $2.05 billion.
The total of 21.77 million shares was transacted over last trading day.

GenVec, Inc. NASDAQ:GNVC opened at $0.59 and with a gain of 8.81% closed at $0.63. Company’s fifty days average price is $0.52 whereas it has a market capitalization $81.31 million.
The total of 4.67 million shares was transacted over last trading day.

Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. NASDAQ:MGIC opened at $8.09 and with a gain of 8.57% closed at $8.00. Company’s fifty days average price is $6.49 whereas it has a market capitalization $274.94 million.
The total of 1.82 million shares was transacted over last trading day.

Solarfun Power Holdings Co., Ltd. (ADR) NASDAQ:SOLF opened at $9.10 and with a gain of 7.33% closed at $9.67. Company’s fifty days average price is $8.72 whereas it has a market capitalization $562.23 million.
The total of 5.30 million shares was transacted over last trading day.

Top Stocks To Buy For 2012-2-1-4

Ness Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:NSTC) witnessed volume of 2.67 million shares during last trade however it holds an average trading capacity of 139,626.00 shares. NSTC last trade opened at $7.61 reached intraday low of $7.59 and went +0.33% up to close at $7.62.

NSTC has a market capitalization $290.64 million and an enterprise value at $325.26 million. Trailing twelve months price to sales ratio of the stock was 0.50 while price to book ratio in most recent quarter was 0.81. In profitability ratios, net profit margin in past twelve months appeared at -0.67% whereas operating profit margin for the same period at 3.90%.

The company made a return on asset of 2.06% in past twelve months and return on equity of 3.38% for similar period. In the period of trailing 12 months it generated revenue amounted to $575.76 million gaining $15.11 revenue per share. Its year over year, quarterly growth of revenue was 3.00%.

According to preceding quarter balance sheet results, the company had $34.78 million cash in hand making cash per share at 0.91. The total of $70.16 million debt was there putting a total debt to equity ratio 19.68.mMoreover its current ratio according to same quarter results was 1.23 and book value per share was9.34.

Looking at the trading information, the stock price history displayed that its S&P500 52 Week Change illustrated 15.48% where the stock price exhibited up beat from its 50 day moving average with $6.43 and remained above from its 200 Day Moving Average with $6.06.

NSTC holds 38.14 million outstanding shares with 33.50 million floating shares where insider possessed 0.09% and institutions kept 61.20%.

Streaming Super Bowl a Good Bet for Comcast, NBC

Comcast (NASDAQ:CMCSA) doesn’t need more viewers for the Super Bowl.

Super Bowl XLV was the most-viewed television broadcast in history when it aired on News Corp.‘s (NASDAQ:NWSA) Fox last February, with 111 million people tuning in. That beat Super Bowl XLIV’s record of 106 million viewers on CBS (NYSE:CBS). The game is broadcast in more than 230 countries around the world, and $3.5 million for a 30-second commercial is considered a steal.

However, television — and the way people watch it — is changing and moving online. And while most people still prefer regular TV to streaming, the trend is clear enough that NBC has decided it’s worth it to stream the entire Super Bowl for free online.

As Peter Kafka at All Things Digital said, NBC Sports digital head Rick Cordella’s thinking is that anyone watching the game online likely is using the webcast as a “second screen,” and the extra “viewers” are merely icing on the massive Super Bowl viewership cake.

NBC has plenty of evidence that there are viewers to be had online. The network’s Sunday Night Football broadcast was the most-watched prime-time television show of the fall in 2011, averaging 21.5 million viewers per week. This season, NBC streamed those regular-season Sunday night games and pulled in between 200,000 and 300,000 unique viewers per game.

At only 1.4% of the regular viewership, that streaming audience might seem like a negligible perk. If NBC can pull in just the same rate of online viewership for the Super Bowl, though, that’ll be an additional 1.6 million viewers on top of what will likely be a record-breaking TV broadcast. Not a bad deal.

There’s incentive for the audience to watch both, too. The webcast will include extras like different camera angles, as well as guaranteed value-boosters for ad buyers, like a feature that lets streamers rewatch all Super Bowl commercials after they’ve aired.

Comcast and NBC are making a good call putting the Super Bowl online. But it’s hard not to wonder if there’s a greater opportunity in this two-screen strategy.

Consider this: Nielsen found last May that 70% of tablet owners use their device while watching television, while 68% of smartphone owners use their handsets while watching TV. The potential to craft advertising content that’s meant to be viewed both on television and on the webcast of the Super Bowl simultaneously is immense.

NBC could take cues from Yahoo‘s (NASDAQ:YHOO) nascent IntoNow app for Apple‘s (NASDAQ:AAPL) iPad. IntoNow listens to television broadcasts and seamlessly brings up additional content to supplement the broadcast. In the case of ESPN’s Monday Night Football, it brings up player stats and additional commentary. Rather than just a couple of extra perks, NBC could build future Super Bowl webcasts so they become a more valuable part of the broader viewing experience — taking advantage of all those audience members already looking at their handheld devices while watching the game.

NBC’s planned extra features for online are a good start, but this inaugural Super Bowl webcast is little more than a rough draft of what NBC can do in the future.

As of this writing, Anthony John Agnello did not own a position in any of the stocks named here. Follow him on Twitter at�@ajohnagnello�and�become a fan of�InvestorPlace on Facebook.

Corporation Preservation Via Competition Control And Deconstruction

As a structuring consultant I’m typically brought into a public company or large private company that is in the middle of a crisis management situation and I become a fixer. My firm will analyze the problem, look at it from multiple objective angles apply various template processes and find a solution to counter the issue at hand. Sounds easy but guess again.

Here is what most corporations that find themselves the center of a hostile takeover or slander situation fail to identify early on, eliminate the problem early. Many times it starts with the firing of an employee or an overly competitive bid for a large contract both have the same stimulants and indicators so the C level executive in charge needs to keep their ear to the tracks to be able to identify the dilemma before it becomes an ‘out of control’ publicity nightmare or takeover situation.

It is crucial to identify these individuals and align oneself accordingly to cripple the trigger before it can explode. Most of the problems that your company will face are in your office right now in the embodiment of an overzealous sales manager who believes he has the intellectual superiority to run your company better than you can, if he’s right, promote him but test him first, if he’s wrong offer him a severance and paint a clear picture as to his non compete and scare the life out of him the day he is terminated by having security walk him through the legal actions that will take place if he/she makes any attempt to use your processes or secrets to the public or competition or defames your firms name in anyway. Next bring in your corporate attorney to do the same, then you come in as the nice guy and gently ask him to take this severance and find a job that will meet all his needs both professional and emotional.

Other tell tale signs of potential issues an employee that seems to have something counterproductive to say about everything, the manager with a bad case of the ‘grass is greener’ syndrome, executives that are too entrepreneurial, you get the idea.

Next, you need a protocol in place to take a proactive approach to counter negative PR. You should have a media specialist on call, updated on your corporate strategies and proprietary processes with a plan ready to go to counter blog defamation and other virtual crimes that can dismantle your company or economic status/market place position.

90% of the problems your company will ever have will come from those who are inside right now. Evaluate your executives that have access to trade secrets or issues that could damage your reputation. Plant a seed early. Find someone and make an example of them and make it public and you’ll find that most potential and damaging issues can be shut down before they start by implementing the above as a start.

Want to find out more about Political and Economic Crisis Management Strategies ?, then visit Princeton Corporate Solutions’ blog Economic Globalization Strategies and facilitation that can transform the direction of your company, career or campaign.

WORLD FOREX: Dollar Broadly Higher In Early Asian Trading, Euro Hit By Debt … – Wall Street Journal

USA TodayWORLD FOREX: Dollar Broadly Higher In Early Asian Trading, Euro Hit By Debt …
Wall Street Journal
–Euro hit by continued concerns over debt issues with key Greek parliamentary votes on austerity measures being closely watched. –Falls in share and commodity prices also hit the risk-sensitive euro, further boosting the dollar. …
FOREX-Euro pummeled, hit by Greek austerity doubtsReuters
FOREX: US Dollar Weakness on Greek Aid Deal a Buying OpportunityDaily FX
Forex US Review -Most majors end the week down, Dollar stays strongTrading Point
�Market Leader� – news and previews making you rich. -NASDAQ -Forex Rate It!
all 3,145 news articles »

{forex} – Google News

First Majestic Silver: Management And Growth Prospects Make This A Leading Producer

During the third quarter of 2011 First Majestic's (AG) stock sold off on the news that production would fall short of targets due to the La Encantada mine encountering an area of high manganese, hampering silver recoveries. Since then the once high flying silver stock has spent time building a base and in the past week the stock moved above the $20 per share area as the investors realize that the market overreacted.

Two weeks ago First Majestic released fourth quarter and 2011 production numbers with 2.1 million silver equivalent ounces of production and 7.56 million SEOs for all of 2011, increases of 8 and 17 percent over year ago periods, respectively.

Guidance for 2012 has production reaching 8.9 to 9.4 million SEOs with the expansion at La Parrilla, improvements at La Encantada, and the opening of the Del Toro mine driving the increase.

The La Parrilla expansion will increase capacity to 2,000 tpd and should be operating at full capacity in February. The focus now shifts to the construction of a 2,000 tpd shaft at Rosarios and the construction of an underground rail system that will connect the four mines on the property. $20 million dollars has been budgeted for these capital projects.

Del Toro continues to move forward with a new Preliminary Economic Assessment due at the end of the first quarter of 2012. The new 4,000 tpd dual circuit mill will replace the 2,000 tpd mill in the original assessment. The new plan calls for 1,000 tpd to be completed by the end of 2012 with an expansion to 2,000 tpd in 2013, and 4,000 in 2014.

First Majestic is the stock with the greatest leverage to silver prices with 96% of revenue being tied to the price of silver and significant organic growth potential with production estimated at 16 million ounces for 2014.

Investors looking for one of the leading silver stocks should start with First Majestic whose management and growth prospects place the company as the leading producer in the silver mining sector.

Disclosure: I am long AG.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Paul-onomics vs. Obama-nomics: The Battle is On


Campaign 2012 is racing forth at full throttle.

Although Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney appear to lead as front runners in the race towards the Republican nomination, it's the “crazy-ole-nut” – Ron Paul – who's currently one of Obama's most challenging opponents when it comes to reviving the economy.

It's no secret that Paul aims to end the Fed with a desire to return to the gold standard. He has even won-over quite a few loyal fans with his trillion-dollar-budget-cut plan.

The surprise is, latest observations and data show that his allegedly “crazy” ideas are now catching on with other Republicans. Gingrich recently announced that he has adopted some of Paul's ideas regarding “economic libertarianism.” If America elects Gingrich as president, he has promised to "look at the whole concept of how do we get back to hard money." 

Now, it truly seems plausible that the gold standard could realistically come back into existence if either one of these Republicans takes Obama's position in the White House.

And now, more than ever, focusing on monetary reform may be exactly what needs to be done in order to obtain the popular vote.

As demonstrated this past year by Occupy Wall Street protesters, citizens of this country are pissed off. They are pissed off at Wall Street and they are pissed off with the Fed for bailing out big-banks. Taxpayers want their bail-out money returned to them.

According to MSN Money:

All are tired of the Fed's monetary policy experiments, its bouts of quantitative easing, a monetary base that has gone from $800 billion to nearly $2.8 trillion in the past few years, and the bouts of inflation in commodities such as gas and food that result from all this. Many realize that it was the Fed's mistaken obsession with the risk of deflation -- falling prices -- and its overconfidence in its own abilities that incubated the housing bubble, starting in 2003, and led it to deny anything was wrong as the bubble started to burst in 2007.

The response of the American people has welcomed the idea of making some dramatic changes to the government and monetary standards. 

History proves that a true gold standard can work and can even keep the value of the dollar steady. This was true in the years 1834-1914 (except during the Civil War years).

Nonetheless, the technical changes to hard money would be no simple feat...but, they are feasible.

These goals, while satisfied by the gold standard, are also satisfied by a rule-based approach Taylor created that has since been dubbed the "Taylor Rule." It's an equation that targets a specific interest rate based on inflation and how quickly the economy is growing relative to its potential, which acts as a speed limit. Go too fast, you get inflation. Go too slow, you get unemployment.

The time for action is now. Meltzer warned me that it's not just Ron Paul-types who are angry at the dilettantes playing with the dollar. Over the past few months, some $85 billion worth of U.S. Treasury debt has been sold by investors in the Chinese and Japanese governments. While the overall amount is a pittance compared with the $15.2 trillion in government debt outstanding, it represents a sea change.

The theme here seems to be that the American people have caught on to the danger associated with ignoring this issue and the related dangers of following through with a third does of Quantitative Easing instead. That issue alone creates a sense of urgency that may be enough to get someone like Paul into office...

 

Commodities Boom: Will Coal Be the Next Gold?

By Martin Hutchinson

The run-up in commodities prices has been a long one. And it shows no signs of abating.

As a Money Morning reader, you know that we predicted this run-up. Back in October 2007, for instance, we told readers to buy gold - when it was trading at $770 an ounce. Those of you who followed our advice have done quite well.

But now it's time to make a new prediction.

The run-up in commodities prices isn't going to end. But it is going to change.

You see, commodities are going to break into two distinct groups: Traditional inflation hedges, such as gold, and big industrial commodities, such as coal.

Going forward, the industrial path will be the one that investors will want to travel for maximum profit. Here's the No. 1 way to play what we're calling "the commodities boom of 2011."

The Lowdown on the Commodities Run-Up

With commodities such as silver and gold, the prices are based on speculative demand. During the current run-up, loose global monetary conditions and the fear of inflation have served as the catalyst for record prices. For the last two years, governments around the world have used monetary policy as a tool to prop up their economies after the financial crash. That has pushed up gold and silver prices: The increase in the yellow metal has been moderate, albeit steady, while silver has doubled in the last 18 months.

However, interest rates are now rising in many countries, as central banks work to head off inflationary pressures. In both Britain and the Eurozone, interest-rate increases are quite close - in Britain, where inflation has already appeared there at the 4% - 5% level, and in the Eurozone, because the managers of the European Central Bank are monetarily quite conservative.

It is already fairly unlikely that U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke will succeed in imposing another period of "quantitative easing" - involving large-scale purchases of U.S. Treasury bonds - after the current "QE" program expires in June.

By the fourth quarter, inflation stemming from the world's rising commodity prices may penetrate the notoriously insensitive price reports from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). If that happens, Bernanke & Co. may be forced to start increasing interest rates by the end of this year - although the Fed chairman will no doubt do his best to delay and limit the process, as he and predecessor Alan Greenspan did from 2004 - 06.

With monetary policy gradually getting tighter - and trillions of fewer dollars in liquidity sloshing around the global economy - the upward pressure on gold and silver prices will decrease, although those won't disappear immediately.

At the other end of the commodities spectrum - in food commodities and bulky commodities such as iron ore - the trajectory will be different. With this group of commodities, the primary upward catalyst won't be global monetary policy; it will be the rapid growth in emerging-market economies.

Emerging-market consumers, whose incomes are rapidly growing, are nevertheless poorer than Western consumers and do not have the basic goods that are associated with modern affluence. Hence, those newly minted middle-class consumers are now buying modern apartments, automobiles, kitchen appliances and a host of other items that, unlike electronic gadgetry, require large amounts of such basic materials as iron and steel to manufacture.

Since demand for basic industrial commodities is driven by emerging-market consumers - and not by monetary policy - there is relatively little speculative activity in coal or iron ore. Instead, the demand is industrial in nature.

This is an important distinction for prospective investors. You see, price increases driven by industrial demand are likely to persist longer than those that were speculative in nature, particularly since it's not at all likely that modest interest-rate increases will kill off the growth that we're seeing in emerging-market economies.

Keep an Eye on Supply

We should not, of course, neglect the supply side. For some commodities - most notably oil - a number of new supply sources have arisen over the last five years. For instance, Canadian tar sands now form a more-substantial part of the U.S. oil picture.

And with oil-shale prices currently near $100 per barrel, this is now a viable source of additional supply. Colorado has a big supply. Outside the United States, the Tupi oil fields in Brazil are due to come on-stream in 2012, while Colombian production has been increasing at a rapid rate and is expected to ramp up further in coming years.

Moreover, the speculative zoom that oil prices experienced in the summer of 2008 showed us that - at prices above $100 per barrel - demand becomes quite sensitive to oil prices, partly because very high oil prices tend to deflate non-oil-producing economies. Thus, the upward pressure on oil prices is likely to be moderate.

Conversely, copper is particularly likely to continue rising in price because new sources of supply take a very long time to come on stream, and many mining projects were severely delayed by the 2008-09 global downturn.

In addition, speculative demand by hedge funds and through the exchange-traded-funds mechanism is withdrawing physical copper from the market, a much more serious problem than with gold, because the world does not have large stocks of unused copper.

Thus, copper - which is "in the middle," between the speculative and industrial commodities - is likely to continue rising in price, until major new sources of supply come on stream in 2014-15.

That brings us to coal, which is shaping up to be the best way to profit from the commodities boom of 2011.

The No. 1 Profit Play

Coal is at the far industrial end of the spectrum: In the past, supplies have been plentiful, and speculative demand negligible.

Both China and India are heavily dependent on coal for electric power. And both countries have increasingly resorted to imports as demand grows. Furthermore, coal mining has not been particularly profitable in recent years, and developing new coal mines in advanced countries is a permitting nightmare because of the environmentalists.

There is thus much less capital in the coal industry than there is in the oil sector, and much less ability to ramp up production to meet soaring demand.

So where does that leave us? Coal mines - not gold mines - will be the key to investor profits in the commodities boom of 2011.

As an investor, you could do a lot worse than Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. (CLF) . Cliffs, working through several Australian joint ventures, is a major coal supplier to China. And through its acquisition of Canada's Consolidated Thompson Iron Mines Ltd. (CLM), a $5 billion deal announced just last month, Cliffs will become the largest-iron-ore producer in North America.

Cliffs has had a very good run, with its stock price having more than doubled in the past 18 months, but isn't overvalued. The Consolidated deal will broaden its reach. And it remains very strategically positioned, indeed.

The investment leaders up to this point - chiefly gold and silver - are going to give way to industrial commodities: Copper, iron ore and others. But the big star could be coal. And the No. 1 way to play it is Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.

Cliffs is a major coal supplier to China. And through its acquisition of Canada's Consolidated Thompson Iron Mines Ltd., a $5 billion deal announced just last month, Cliffs will become the largest-iron-ore producer in North America.

Cliffs isn't overvalued - despite its stock having had a good run. The Consolidated deal will broaden its reach. And it remains very strategically positioned, indeed.

Disclosure: None

Original Post

Contrarian Ideas: 20 High Yield Stocks With Bearish Options Sentiment

The following is a list of high yield dividend stocks. Additionally, all of these companies mentioned below have a large number of open put option positions relative to call option positions, i.e. a high Put/Call ratio.

Some technical traders view the Put/Call ratio as a contrary indicator when it reaches extreme highs or lows. In other words, because the stocks mentioned below have a high number of open put option positions, contrarians would think most of the stocks mentioned below are set for gains. Do you agree?

Options data sourced from Schaeffer's; dividend yield, short float and performance data sourced from Finviz.

Click for expanded image


Sorted by dividend yield.

1. Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR): Mortgage Investment Industry. Market cap of $1.11B. Dividend yield at 15.33%. Call open interest at 1,629 contracts vs. put open interest at 4,788 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 2.94). Short float at 2.37%, which implies a short ratio of 1.46 days. The stock has gained 21.06% over the last year.

2. Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (ANH): REIT. Market cap of $851.92M. Dividend yield at 12.52%. Call open interest at 1,589 contracts vs. put open interest at 6,995 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 4.4). Short float at 4.26%, which implies a short ratio of 4.45 days. The stock has gained 20.1% over the last year.

3. Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC): Asset Management Industry. Market cap of $1.07B. Dividend yield at 10.08%. Call open interest at 2,046 contracts vs. put open interest at 3,488 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.7). Short float at 5%, which implies a short ratio of 3.42 days. The stock has gained 16.89% over the last year.

4. Capital Product Partners L.P. (CPLP): Shipping Industry. Market cap of $372.29M. Dividend yield at 9.38%. Call open interest at 207 contracts vs. put open interest at 451 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 2.18). Short float at 1.68%, which implies a short ratio of 2.32 days. The stock has gained 14.87% over the last year.

5. Vector Group Ltd. (VGR): Cigarettes Industry. Market cap of $1.27B. Dividend yield at 9.46%. Call open interest at 415 contracts vs. put open interest at 708 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.71). Short float at 6.11%, which implies a short ratio of 6.83 days. The stock has gained 28.65% over the last year.

6. PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT): REIT. Market cap of $305.8M. Dividend yield at 9.25%. Call open interest at 175 contracts vs. put open interest at 272 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.55). Short float at 2.77%, which implies a short ratio of 2.81 days. The stock has gained 17.99% over the last year.

7. Encore Energy Partners LP (ENP): Oil and Gas Drilling and Exploration Industry. Market cap of $1.06B. Dividend yield at 8.86%. Call open interest at 513 contracts vs. put open interest at 1,022 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.99). Short float at 0.9%, which implies a short ratio of 0.84 days. The stock has gained 28.62% over the last year.

8. BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT): Oil and Gas Refining and Marketing Industry. Market cap of $2.38B. Dividend yield at 7.52%. Call open interest at 2,162 contracts vs. put open interest at 3,395 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.57). Short float at 1.62%, which implies a short ratio of 1.45 days. The stock has gained 35.77% over the last year.

9. Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (HTGC): Diversified Investments Industry. Market cap of $396.42M. Dividend yield at 7.32%. Call open interest at 166 contracts vs. put open interest at 254 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.53). Short float at 2.37%, which implies a short ratio of 3.34 days. The stock has gained 22.05% over the last year.

10. Medical Properties Trust Inc. (MPW): REIT. Market cap of $1.27B. Dividend yield at 7.09%. Call open interest at 409 contracts vs. put open interest at 646 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.58). Short float at 3.54%, which implies a short ratio of 4.51 days. The stock has gained 16.26% over the last year.

11. Getty Realty Corp. (GTY): REIT. Market cap of $869.76M. Dividend yield at 6.68%. Call open interest at 755 contracts vs. put open interest at 3,248 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 4.3). Short float at 5.2%, which implies a short ratio of 3.76 days. The stock has gained 40% over the last year.

12. Penn Virginia Resource Partners LP (PVR): Industrial Metals and Minerals Industry. Market cap of $1.5B. Dividend yield at 6.58%. Call open interest at 668 contracts vs. put open interest at 1,369 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 2.05). Short float at 5.13%, which implies a short ratio of 10.63 days. The stock has gained 33.24% over the last year.

13. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (SJT): Diversified Investments Industry. Market cap of $1.16B. Dividend yield at 6.48%. Call open interest at 1,889 contracts vs. put open interest at 6,070 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 3.21). Short float at 2.23%, which implies a short ratio of 6.22 days. The stock has gained 26.57% over the last year.

14. Lorillard, Inc. (LO): Cigarettes Industry. Market cap of $11.9B. Dividend yield at 6.50%. Call open interest at 16,700 contracts vs. put open interest at 45,076 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 2.7). Short float at 6.72%, which implies a short ratio of 5.43 days. The stock has gained 9.56% over the last year.

15. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP (KMP): Oil and Gas Pipelines Industry. Market cap of $22.8B. Dividend yield at 6.25%. Call open interest at 6,063 contracts vs. put open interest at 9,142 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.51). Short float at 1.89%, which implies a short ratio of 6.53 days. The stock has gained 22.15% over the last year.

16. Enbridge Energy Partners LP (EEP): Oil and Gas Pipelines Industry. Market cap of $8.28B. Dividend yield at 6.17%. Call open interest at 557 contracts vs. put open interest at 1,011 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.82). Short float at 0.36%, which implies a short ratio of 1.3 days. The stock has gained 38.48% over the last year.

17. Government Properties Income Trust (GOV): REIT. Market cap of $1.08B. Dividend yield at 6.25%. Call open interest at 145 contracts vs. put open interest at 328 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 2.26). Short float at 2.48%, which implies a short ratio of 4.19 days. The stock has gained 20.11% over the last year.

18. Reynolds American Inc. (RAI): Cigarettes Industry. Market cap of $20.15B. Dividend yield at 6.14%. Call open interest at 6,222 contracts vs. put open interest at 15,885 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 2.55). Short float at 1.14%, which implies a short ratio of 2.73 days. The stock has gained 39.35% over the last year.

19. NuStar Energy L.P. (NS): Oil and Gas Pipelines Industry. Market cap of $4.54B. Dividend yield at 6.16%. Call open interest at 451 contracts vs. put open interest at 837 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.86). Short float at 0.81%, which implies a short ratio of 3.99 days. The stock has gained 33.53% over the last year.

20. Buckeye Partners LP (BPL): Oil and Gas Pipelines Industry. Market cap of $3.33B. Dividend yield at 6.18%. Call open interest at 1,079 contracts vs. put open interest at 1,991 contracts (Put/Call ratio at 1.85). Short float at 0.74%, which implies a short ratio of 1.7 days. The stock has gained 19.85% over the last year.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Goldman to Fight Over Hancock

A Goldman Sachs Group Inc. real-estate fund that has walked away from a number of struggling investments is taking a different approach with a Chicago skyscraper, deciding to fight its creditors rather than surrender ownership of the building.

Goldman and its partner, property manager Golub & Co., are required to repay on Feb. 9 some $400 million in debt that they put on the John Hancock Center after they purchased the 100-story tower in 2007. But a default is likely because the owners haven't been able to sell or refinance for that amount.

Indeed, Goldman's Whitehall real-estate fund last week requested a loan extension and is preparing to challenge in court any efforts by debtholders to take over the building, according to a letter from its attorney reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. The $400 million in debt consists of a $182 million senior loan that was converted into commercial mortgage-backed securities and the rest in three pieces of junior debt.

Enlarge Image

Close Getty Images

The John Hancock Building (black tower) in Chicago is 81% leased. Goldman's Whitehall fund and Golub face repayment of some $400 million in debt that they put on the building.

The letter accuses some of the junior creditors with interfering with Goldman's business plan to sell the building in five pieces. That plan "would have enabled the borrowers to repay the loans in full well before the stated maturity and to earn a meaningful profit," the letter states.

Those junior debtholders—Chicago developer John Buck Co., a Morgan Stanley real-estate fund and NorthStar Realty Finance—declined to comment or didn't respond.

Others familiar with the property say that Whitehall's problem is primarily that the fund and Golub paid too much when they purchased the tower for $383 million in 2007.

At that price, the building would need annual office rents around $35 a square foot to be profitable, or about $7 to $8 more than it is getting, according to Jack McKinney, president of the Chicago real-estate-services firm J.F. McKinney & Associates. "That's not achievable," Mr. McKinney said. "They bought it for too much."

Goldman's tougher stand comes at a time when commercial-property battles are erupting throughout the country as loans made during the boom years come due. They often pit owners against junior debtholders who angle to take over properties by foreclosing and assuming the senior debt.

What is unusual in the fight over John Hancock Center is that, if Whitehall ends up challenging lenders in court, it would represent a break from its recent conciliatory approach toward lenders. The once highflying fund was humbled by a number of real-estate investments that collapsed during the downturn, and it has generally preferred to turn over the keys or negotiate with creditors when property loans soured.

Goldman's adversaries for control of the tower may change because a number of investors are looking at acquiring a $98 million piece of junior debt held by the Morgan Stanley fund and John Buck, say people familiar with the matter. These investors include private-equity giant Blackstone Group, people said.

Whitehall's charge against some of its junior creditors is known as "lender liability" in real-estate circles. Often used by owners facing foreclosure actions, it essentially tries to shift the blame for a default to creditors.

Whitehall believes that it would be able to make more than the $400 million it owes by selling the building in separate parts: the retail, office, broadcast tower, observation deck and garage. The letter, signed by Daniel Tabak, a lawyer at Cohen & Gresser, claims that this plan "received conditional approval" in 2007 from KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, the servicer at the time of the debt that was converted into commercial-mortgage securities.

The letter also states that the original holder of the junior debt, Lehman Brothers, "was prepared to formally approve" the plan, too. But Lehman sold that debt shortly before the firm collapsed in 2008 to investors including the Morgan Stanley fund, John Buck and NorthStar. Those investors refused to approve the sales strategy, the letter said.

The lenders "were not acting in good faith" and their true goal "was to wrest ownership of the property from the borrowers," the letter alleges.

Real-estate attorneys say it is hard to say how effective Whitehall's legal case will be, and that claims that exist on anything less than a formal written agreement can be tough to prove. Some lawyers suggest it could be a Whitehall ploy to strengthen its hand in negotiations with creditors.

At 1,127 feet, the John Hancock Center is one of the tallest and most-recognizable towers in Chicago's skyline. The building's is 81% leased, according to CoStar Group, a real-estate research firm.

The building isn't in a prime office location for many companies, brokers say. Its office tenants include advertising firms, diplomats and doctors attracted by the property's proximity to nearby upscale residential neighborhoods and Northwestern Memorial Hospital.

Write to Craig Karmin at craig.karmin@wsj.com and Maura Webber Sadovi at maura.sadovi@wsj.com

SM: Hire Hopes for Job Seekers With Dodgy...

With the nation's unemployment remaining stubbornly high, a number of states are taking a step to help job seekers: banning credit checks.

This month, California became the seventh state to prohibit companies from doing credit checks on many applicants, and similar bills are pending in another 19 states. On the federal level, a bill that calls for a similar ban is awaiting review by a House subcommittee. The moves could be "a game changer for people negatively affected by this economy," says Persis Yu, staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center.

The trend also has ramifications for employers, who for years have been permitted to review the credit histories of prospective workers. The assumption, experts say, is that a bad credit report might help flag poor work habits and decision-making, and even general untrustworthiness.

Indeed, some 60% of employers report doing credit checks for some or all job candidates, according to the Society for Human Resource Management. Of those, more than 60% said they are unlikely to accept an applicant with an outstanding judgment currently filed against them, while nearly half would likely pass on one with accounts in debt collection.

Some research seems to back employers' fears: Nearly one third of employees with self-reported credit problems engaged in "counterproductive work behavior," such as theft or accepting bribes, compared to about 18% of employees without financial problems, according to a 2008 academic study.

But consumer advocates say credit problems are more widespread now because of the struggling economy. Over the past two years, for instance, roughly 4.8 million homeowners have received a foreclosure notice, according to RealtyTrac.com. A foreclosure stays on a consumer's credit report for seven years.

Given that backdrop, some argue that employers should hire based on skills and qualifications and not credit histories. Those in the job market "have plenty of obstacles right now and should not have to try to defend the fact that they missed payments on bills," says Diane Rosenbaum, an Oregon state senator whose bill banning certain credit checks became law in 2010.

Case in point: Karen Selling, a dietetic technician, says she and her husband, Christopher, a diesel mechanic, of Shelton, Conn., have been on dozens of interviews over the past two years, but neither has been hired because of their credit histories. When their son got sick a few years ago, the Sellings racked up medical debt and fell behind on their mortgage. "Nobody is giving us a chance," she says.

In many states with the new laws, employers can still check the reports of applicants for certain white-collar jobs, such as bankers and law-enforcement positions.

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, companies must get permission from applicants in writing to check their credit reports. For those with credit problems, it is better to explain what happened rather than deny permission, says John Ulzheimer, president of consumer education at SmartCredit.com, a credit-monitoring site.

Private Placements Are Sometimes Bad Investments

A Private Placement Trading Program (PPP) is a lucrative way of investing and as long as the PPP is genuine, there is no financial risk for investors. As you can imagine, if you are offered a no-risk high profit opportunity in the stock market business you would probably be tempted to jump at the chance. However if you are tempted by PPPs beware, and realize that they are not always what they seem. Many investors have been stung in PPP scams and billions of dollars have been lost. There are law suits underway, but they are notoriously slow to reach a conclusion and given the amount of scams that have been uncovered, relatively few perpetrators have gone to court.

High Returns for Ethical Investments
Private Placement Programs are those trading with Medium term Bank Notes (MTNs) or Treasury bills (T-Bills). They typically have a high return on the investment and are, more often than not associated with ethical trading. They involve programs which are humanitarian in nature. Investors are required to put part of their earnings into projects which are concerned with humanitarian, social or economic development. Profits from such projects go back into the economy, giving it a much needed boost.

It is Not Legal for Financial Institutions to Invest in PPPs
Financial Institutions are not legally allowed to participate in such programs so have to find private individuals or companies to invest in them. The investor cannot lose money as the investment is underwritten by the trading group.

This means that the investor is in a win-win situation for once, so it is hardly surprising that some unethical companies have found PPPs useful for conning high level investors out of their capital. The difficulty is that every investor would love to invest in a PPP, but can’t access them as they open and close quickly, so it is very difficult to find a performing trade.

Tell-Tale Signs That All is Not Well
When national brokerage firms refuse to touch Private Placement Programs, it’s a sure sign that something is “rotten in the state of Denmark” to quote Shakespeare. Even with high commissions available and fees, PPPs are considered dangerous. It’s a case of once bitten twice shy. Businesses have invested unethically in fields that they are not allowed to invest in under the terms of PPPs, including pornographic web sites. So now brokers are very wary of even considering a PPP.

Basically as with every other promise of spectacular wealth or extravagant claims of what product X can do for you, the reality is that the investment or product really is too good to be true. Unfortunately PPPs are to be looked into very carefully. If you do get a genuine one, then you can count yourself extremely lucky.

http://www.herbs-treatandtaste.blogspot.com

The Best Advice I Can Give ANY Investor

It's the best way I know to create significant wealth in the stock market.

It's been one of the guiding principles for my $100,000 portfolio in my Top 10 Stocks advisory, my selections for the 10 Best Stocks to Hold Forever, and my Top 10 Stocks for 2012.

Put simply, you can make a lot of money investing in companies that dominate their market.

But I doubt that's news to you. You've heard something similar for decades. Today, I want to prove to you that this technique works.

 

For example, take Philip Morris International (NYSE: PM).

Philip Morris dominates the cigarette industry thanks to its ownership of seven of the world's top 15 brands, including Marlboro, the No.1 cigarette brand worldwide. It's not a complex business. And you don't need to be a hedge-fund manager to see why owning Philip Morris is likely to make you money.

Its dominant position in its market has led to huge gains for investors. And those gains all start with company profits.

Philip Morris' net profit margin stands at 28%. This means the company turns nearly a third of its revenue into pure profit.

Most companies don't even come close to this. The average net profit margin for all members of the S&P 500 is 11%.

When you invest in world dominators like these, good things tend to happen.

Since being spun off from Altria (NYSE: MO) back in 2008, Philip Morris has bought back $20 billion worth of shares and paid $14 billion in dividends. It's raised its dividend 67%, and the stock is now paying DOUBLE the average dividend yield paid by the overall market.

Over time, these shareholder-friendly moves have led to exceptional market-beating returns.

Take a look below. Since the spin-off, Philip Morris has returned 80%. Meanwhile, the overall market has gone nowhere...
 
It's simple. Investing in dominant firms like Philip Morris is likely to pay off handsomely. I've gained nearly 20% since I added the stock to my Top 10 Stocks Portfolio last June.

I often call stocks like Philip Morris "no-brainer" investments because I'm 100% convinced that if you buy them at the right price, then they are virtually guaranteed to make you money in the long run.

Let's take a look at another dominating company -- Intel (Nasdaq: INTC). It's not only one of the most profitable firms in America... it's also one of the best investments on the planet, hands down.

Intel controls 80% of the microprocessor market, making it a virtual monopoly. And that monopoly position has led to huge gains for investors -- every $100 invested in Intel in 1972 would be worth $198,000 today.

Just like Philip Morris, Intel has enormous margins -- it turns 24% of every dollar in revenue into pure profit.

In 2011, Intel earned $54 billion in revenue -- that's greater than the gross domestic product of 110 different countries. It increased its dividend 110% in the past five years and spent $14 billion on share buybacks in 2011 alone.

And if you need more proof that Intel is a great investment, how about the backing of the world's greatest investor? Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B) recently bought 9.3 million shares of Intel valued at more than $240 million.

For Top 10 Stocks, I waited to buy Intel until I saw a dip in its share price. That proved to be a smart time to buy. The stock has already delivered 38% gains since I added it to my real-money Top 10 Stocks Portfolio in September.

Intel is a great investment. But most investors look at stocks like Intel the wrong way.

Because the stock has delivered incredible gains for investors over the years, they think they've "missed their chance." They believe that to make money in the stock market, they need to "go where the action is."

I'm convinced this is why most investors lose money in the stock market.

> If you want to earn serious wealth in the market, then it's not going to be with companies that are "hot" today and then forgotten months or years from now. Those companies are often extremely risky.

The best stocks usually won't make you money overnight. They take time to reach their potential. In the meantime, they dominate their markets... pay generous dividends... and buy back billions of dollars worth of shares.

Top Stocks For 2012-2-1-1

 

QU�BEC CITY, Aug. 30, 2011 (CRWENEWSWIRE) - Aeterna Zentaris Inc. (NASDAQ:AEZS) (TSX:AEZ.TO) (the “Company”) today announced favorable top-line results of its completed Phase 3 study with AEZS-130 as the first oral diagnostic test for Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency (AGHD). The results show that AEZS-130 reached its primary endpoint demonstrating >90% area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, which determines the level of specificity and sensitivity of the product. The Company is currently proceeding with further detailed analyses of the data and preparing for a pre-New Drug Application (NDA) meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the upcoming months, which would be followed by the filing of a NDA for the registration of AEZS-130 in the United States.

The parameters of the study, as defined below under Study Design, were achieved as agreed to with FDA under our Special Protocol Assessment (SPA). Importantly, the primary efficacy parameters show that the study achieved both specificity and sensitivity at a level of 90% or greater. In addition, 8 of the 10 newly enrolled AGHD patients were correctly classified by a pre-specified peak GH threshold level. The use of AEZS-130 was shown to be safe and well tolerated overall throughout the completion of this trial.

“We are pleased with the results obtained and we therefore expect to meet with the FDA and work out the content of a submission for an NDA. We believe that AEZS-130 could become the first approved oral test for the diagnosis of AGHD, providing patients with a potentially safer, accurate and more convenient alternative to the current injectable tests”, stated Juergen Engel, Ph.D., President and CEO at Aeterna Zentaris.

Study History

The study titled, “A Multi-Center Study Investigating a New, Oral Growth Hormone Secretagogue (AEZS-130, formerly ARD-07) as a Growth Hormone (GH) Stimulation Test in Terms of Safety and Efficacy”, was originally initiated to compare the performance of AEZS-130 against the then-available diagnostic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) Geref Diagnostic� + Arginine (ARG) standard test. Geref Diagnostic� was subsequently withdrawn from the market, worldwide, in 2008; the trial’s sponsor, Ardana Biosciences (Ardana), discontinued the study for financial reasons before it was completed. In 2009, Aeterna Zentaris entered into an agreement with administrators of Ardana and regained the rights to AEZS-130, and with the FDA, established the best way forward to complete this Phase 3 study and continue to utilize the data already obtained, in light of the loss of the original comparator. A Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) granted by the FDA, resulted in a modification of the original study, without altering the basic study design so that the completed portion of the study and the new part of the study would provide one, complete, Phase 3 study.

Study Design

The first part of the study conducted by Ardana was a two-way crossover study involving 42 patients with confirmed AGHD or multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies and a low insulin-like growth factor-I. A control group of 10 subjects without AGHD were matched to patients for age, gender, body mass index and (for females) estrogen status.

Each patient received two dosing regimens in random order, while fasting, at least 1 week apart. One regimen consisted of a 1 �g/kg (max. 100 �g) dose of GHRH (Geref Diagnostic�, Serono) with 30 g of ARG (Ar-Gine�, Pfizer) administered intravenously over 30 minutes; the other regimen was a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight of AEZS-130 given in an oral solution of 0.5 mg/ml.

As a result of the SPA reached with the FDA in order to complete the trial, the second part of the study contained the following revisions/additions to the first protocol:

An additional 30 normal control subjects were to be enrolled to match the AGHD patients from the original cohort;
Further, an additional 20 subjects were to be enrolled: 10 AGHD patients and 10 matched normal control subjects;
The above brought the database to ~100 subjects;
All subjects received a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight of AEZS-130;
As a secondary endpoint, the protocol required that at least 8 of the 10 newly enrolled AGHD patients be correctly classified by a pre-specified peak GH threshold level.

About AEZS-130

AEZS-130, a ghrelin agonist, is a novel orally active small molecule that stimulates the secretion of growth hormone. The Company has completed a Phase 3 trial for use as a simple oral diagnostic test for adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD). AEZS-130 works by stimulating a patient’s growth hormone secretion, which normally only occurs during sleep, after which a healthcare provider will measure how well the body responds to that stimulation based on the patient’s growth hormone levels over a period of time. Low growth hormone levels, despite giving an effective stimulating agent, confirm a diagnosis of AGHD. AEZS-130 has been granted orphan-drug designation by the FDA for use as a diagnostic test for growth hormone deficiency. Aeterna Zentaris owns the worldwide rights to AEZS-130 which, if approved, would become the first orally administered diagnostic test for AGHD.

About AGHD

AGHD affects 35,000 adult Americans, with 6,000 new adult patients diagnosed each year. Growth hormone not only plays an important role in growth from childhood to adulthood, but helps promote good health throughout life. AGHD is usually characterized by low energy levels, decreased strength and exercise tolerance, increased weight or difficulty losing weight, emotional changes, anxiety and impaired sleep. Available diagnostic tests for AGHD are complex and can produce significant side effects.

About Aeterna Zentaris Inc.

Aeterna Zentaris is a late-stage oncology drug development company currently investigating potential treatments for various cancers including colorectal, multiple myeloma, endometrial, ovarian, prostate and bladder cancer. The Company’s innovative approach of “personalized medicine” means tailoring treatments to a patient’s specific condition and to unmet medical needs. Aeterna Zentaris’ deep pipeline is drawn from its proprietary discovery unit providing the Company with constant and long-term access to state-of-the-art therapeutic options. For more information please visit www.aezsinc.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbour provisions of the U.S. Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the availability of funds and resources to pursue R&D projects, the successful and timely completion of clinical studies, the ability of the Company to take advantage of business opportunities in the pharmaceutical industry, uncertainties related to the regulatory process and general changes in economic conditions. Investors should consult the Company’s quarterly and annual filings with the Canadian and U.S. securities commissions for additional information on risks and uncertainties relating to forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update these forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future results, events or developments, unless required to do so by a governmental authority or by applicable law.

 

 

THIS IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY SECURITY!