Friday, June 29, 2012

Huntsman Looks Undervalued

As part of our process, we perform a rigorous discounted cash-flow methodology that dives into the true intrinsic worth of companies. In Huntsman's (HUN) case, we think the firm is undervalued. Our fair value for the firm is $16 per share, meaningfully higher than where it is trading currently. For some background, we think a comprehensive analysis of a firm's discounted cash-flow valuation, relative valuation versus industry peers, as well as an assessment of technical and momentum indicators, is the best way to identify the most attractive stocks at the best time to buy. This process culminates in what we call our Valuentum Buying Index (click here for more information on our methodology), which ranks stocks on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the best.

If a company is undervalued both on a DCF and on a relative valuation basis and is showing improvement in technical and momentum indicators, it scores high on our scale. Huntsman scores a 3 on our scale (reflecting its undervaluation, neutral relative valuation, and bearish technicals). In the spirit of transparency, our report on Huntsman and hundreds of other companies can be found here.

Our Report on Huntsman

click to enlarge images

Investment Considerations

Investment Highlights

Huntsman's average return on invested capital has trailed its cost of capital during the past few years, indicating weakness in business fundamentals and an inability to earn economic profits through the course of the economic cycle. We think there are better quality firms out there. But even poor firms can be good investments at the right price.

Although we think the firm's DCF valuation indicates a potential attractive investment opportunity, we'd be more comfortable investing in the firm if it was more attractively priced on a relative basis versus peers as well. Huntsman's cash flow generation is about what we'd expect from an average company in our coverage universe. However, the firm's financial leverage is on the high side. If cash flows begin to falter, we'd grow more cautious on the firm's overall financial health.

The firm posts a VBI score of 3. We don't find the firm that attractive based on this measure, and we'd only consider adding it to the portfolio of our Best Ideas Newsletter if it registered an 8 or higher on our scale.

The firm sports a very nice dividend yield of 3.9%. We expect the firm to pay out about 23% of next year's earnings to shareholders as dividends.

Economic Profit Analysis

The best measure of a firm's ability to create value for shareholders is expressed by comparing its return on invested capital [ROIC] with its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The gap or difference between ROIC and WACC is called the firm's economic profit spread. Huntsman's 3-year historical return on invested capital (without goodwill) is 4.8%, which is below the estimate of its cost of capital of 8.8%. As such, we assign the firm a ValueCreation™ rating of POOR. In the chart below, we show the probable path of ROIC in the years ahead based on the estimated volatility of key drivers behind the measure. The solid grey line reflects the most likely outcome, in our opinion, and represents the scenario that results in our fair value estimate.

Cash Flow Analysis

Firms that generate a free cash flow margin (free cash flow divided by total revenue) above 5% are usually considered cash cows. Huntsman's free cash flow margin has averaged about 3.5% during the past 3 years. As such, we think the firm's cash flow generation is relatively MEDIUM. The free cash flow measure shown above is derived by taking cash flow from operations less capital expenditures and differs from enterprise free cash flow (FCFF), which we use in deriving our fair value estimate for the company. At Huntsman, cash flow from operations dropped into negative territory from levels two years ago, while capital expenditures fell about 44% during this time period.

Valuation Analysis

Our discounted cash flow model indicates that Huntsman's shares are worth between $11.00- $21.00 each. The margin of safety around our fair value estimate is driven by the firm's HIGH ValueRisk™ rating, which is derived from the historical volatility of key valuation drivers. Our model reflects a compound annual revenue growth rate of 6.4% during the next five years, a pace that is higher than the firm's 3-year historical compound annual growth rate of -1.4%. Our model reflects a 5-year projected average operating margin of 6.6%, which is above Huntsman's trailing 3-year average. Beyond year 5, we assume free cash flow will grow at an annual rate of 2.8% for the next 15 years and 3% in perpetuity. For Huntsman, we use a 8.8% weighted average cost of capital to discount future free cash flows. Margin of Safety Analysis

Our discounted cash flow process values each firm on the basis of the present value of all future free cash flows. Although we estimate the firm's fair value at about $16 per share, every company has a range of probable fair values that's created by the uncertainty of key valuation drivers (like future revenue or earnings, for example). After all, if the future was known with certainty, we wouldn't see much volatility in the markets as stocks would trade precisely at their known fair values. Our ValueRisk™ rating sets the margin of safety or the fair value range we assign to each stock. In the graph below, we show this probable range of fair values for Huntsman. We think the firm is attractive below $11 per share (the green line), but quite expensive above $21 per share (the red line). The prices that fall along the yellow line, which includes our fair value estimate, represent a reasonable valuation for the firm, in our opinion.

Future Path of Fair Value

We estimate Huntsman's fair value at this point in time to be about $16 per share. As time passes, however, companies generate cash flow and pay out cash to shareholders in the form of dividends. The chart below compares the firm's current share price with the path of Huntsman's expected equity value per share over the next three years, assuming our long-term projections prove accurate. The range between the resulting downside fair value and upside fair value in Year 3 represents our best estimate of the value of the firm's shares three years hence. This range of potential outcomes is also subject to change over time, should our views on the firm's future cash flow potential change. The expected fair value of $20 per share in Year 3 represents our existing fair value per share of $16 increased at an annual rate of the firm's cost of equity less its dividend yield. The upside and downside ranges are derived in the same way, but from the upper and lower bounds of our fair value estimate range.

Pro Forma Financial Statements Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

No comments:

Post a Comment